The first five months of 2025 have brought unsettling news for the U.S. retail sector. Nearly 76,000 jobs have been lost between January and May, a staggering 274% increase compared to the same period in 2024. According to data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, retail now ranks as the second-most affected sector by layoffs this year, surpassed only by the federal government.

These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. They're signals of deeper instability reverberating across brick-and-mortar retail, department stores, and mall-based specialty chains. Behind each layoff is a business struggling to adapt, an economy in flux, and a customer who’s harder to win over.

READ MORE: Building Resilient Supply Chains Amid Economic Uncertainties

The Forces Behind The Retail Job Cuts

The root causes of the current retail layoff wave are varied but interconnected. Store closures, declining consumer spending, and macroeconomic uncertainty have created the perfect storm. Retailers like Macy’s, Rite Aid, Joann, and Forever 21 have all announced significant reductions in headcount as part of larger restructuring plans. Joann, the craft store chain, filed for bankruptcy for a second time and closed all 800 of its locations. Macy’s is in the process of shuttering 150 underperforming stores over the next three years, with 66 of them already confirmed. Notably, however, this is part of a broader strategy, dubbed "Bold New Chapter," to revitalize the company and return to sustainable, profitable sales growth.

Much of this contraction is driven by a sharp pullback in discretionary spending. Even though the broader economy remains relatively stable, consumers are spending more cautiously. Inflation, interest rates, and the impact of new tariffs have all squeezed household budgets. Retailers who thrived on impulse and experience are now feeling the brunt of this restraint.

There is also a notable policy dimension. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a new initiative intended to streamline federal operations, has had ripple effects on adjacent sectors, including retail. Though not directly responsible for store closures, its broader influence on public-sector employment and economic activity has dampened regional confidence and spending patterns.

Who’s Feeling The Pinch?

The current round of job losses has been especially punishing for department stores and traditional mall-based chains. These retailers are dealing with both a drop in foot traffic and rising operating costs, which include everything from labor to commercial rent. 

Specialty apparel and craft retailers are also vulnerable. Joann’s full exit from the market is perhaps the most dramatic example, but brands like Forever 21 are also retreating from physical storefronts amid intense competition from online fast-fashion platforms like Shein and Temu. The common thread among these closures is an outdated operational model that hasn’t kept pace with modern retail realities.

Geographically, the job cuts have been widespread but particularly acute in states with high concentrations of big-box and department store locations, such as California, Texas, and Florida. In these areas, the local economic impact is compounded by the absence of equally scaled employment alternatives.

EXPLORE: Data Insights From Retailers In Your Territory

Leveraging In-Store Analytics For A More Strategic Approach

Retailers often frame layoffs as a necessary evil, an unavoidable step in the name of efficiency. But there is a smarter path forward… One that doesn’t rely solely on reducing headcount but instead focuses on improving operational intelligence. In-store analytics give retailers real-time visibility into how customers are interacting with their physical spaces.

This technology goes beyond simple foot traffic counts. It can analyze dwell times, shopper paths, conversion rates, and even link these behaviors back to staffing models and marketing efforts. With a clearer picture of what’s happening in the store, managers can make more informed decisions around scheduling, inventory placement, and promotional activity.

Consider labor planning. Rather than applying a blunt instrument approach (that is, cutting hours across the board), a retailer equipped with in-store analytics can staff precisely for the times and zones of highest demand. This not only improves customer experience but also helps avoid the revenue loss that comes from being understaffed at peak times.

Similarly, analytics can improve merchandising strategy. Retailers can test new layouts, product displays, or promotional signage and measure their effect on shopper engagement. The guesswork is removed. And that clarity is essential when margins are tight and every square foot needs to perform.

From a loss prevention perspective, video-integrated analytics also offer a way to tackle shrink more effectively, identifying sources of internal theft or organized retail crime. The result is less waste, fewer unnecessary losses, and a stronger case for preserving headcount by improving operational ROI.

Andrew Challenger of Challenger, Gray & Christmas put it bluntly: “Companies are spending less, slowing hiring, and sending layoff notices.” But this reactive cycle doesn’t have to define the retail industry. If anything, it’s a wake-up call to invest in tools that offer clarity, agility, and long-term resilience.

The good news is that the technology already exists. What’s needed now is the willingness to adopt it not as a luxury, but as a necessity. In-store analytics platforms have matured to the point where they can offer measurable, near-term ROI across staffing, merchandising, marketing, and asset protection.

As layoffs continue to grab headlines, the real story may be about which retailers choose to adapt and which don’t. Those who embrace operational transparency and data-driven decision-making will be better positioned not only to survive the current turbulence but to thrive beyond it.

PRODUCT: How Traffic 3.0 Is Evolving Physical Retail